2) "Probable cause": Therefore there must be "probable" evidence of an actual "crime" against another Human beings equal "individual rights" for ALL "searches and seizures" and "criminal prosecutions"!; FOR ALL 'searches and seizures', 'the supreme Law of the Land' REQUIRES 'probable' evidence I have caused some type of ‘harm’ to another human or their ‘equal’ ‘individual rights’, or it is a ‘color of law abuse’ and/or ‘deprivation of rights under color of law’, rights to privacy and security from ‘unreasonable searches and seizures’, because in the U.S. we need ONLY ‘state…true full name’ when stopped by police and ONLY when there IS ‘probable’ evidence enough to make a ‘reasonable and prudent’ person suspect the accused of a ‘crime’! “Police power exercised without probable cause is arbitrary. To say that the police … may detain them upon reasonable suspicion is to say, in reality, that the police may both accost and detain citizens at their whim.”, “To give the police greater power than a magistrate is to take a long step down the totalitarian path.”. “One has an undoubted right to resist an unlawful arrest, and courts will uphold the right of resistance in proper cases.”. “There is no war between the Constitution and common sense.” Warrantless Search and Seizure/arrest is 'Lawful' ONLY when: there ARE 'exigent' circumstances like is an 'imminent' 'clear and present danger' to protect from, or when the time to get a warrant would likely cause loss of evidence or suspect [Huff v. City of Burbank, 2011, 9th Cir. US App.Ct.] 11) "One has an undoubted right to resist an unlawful arrest, and courts will uphold the right of resistance in proper cases." [US v DiRe, (1948), US S.Ct.. Over-rules all State courts/legislation. No 'trend' in State courts can 'abrogate' this 'undoubted right' declared by the highest court.]
And here is a PayPal donation button for anyone wishing to donate, or hire me...